The course
intends to highlight the relevance of the historical dimension for a deeper
understanding of the multinational enterprise evolution (MNE).
MNE is a
long-standing phenomenon and an historical perspective allows us to better
understand the complex relationships between MNE behaviour and 'soft'
dimensions (such as culture, information transfer, politics etc.) both in the
home and in the host countries.
After a short
theoretical introduction, the course will portray the evolution of MNE during
three paradigmatic periods: the dawn of the Industrial Era, the Second
Industrial Revolution, the post-Second World War years. The final lesson will
offer an insight into the recent globalisation phenomena, explaining their
historical roots and debunking some of the myths often associated with
contemporary MNEs.
Syllabus
1 Introduction
1.1 Course generalities
1.2 Introduction of the main topics
through the analysis of the documentary “Assignment: Venezuela”
(1956, Creole Oil Co.)
2 A theoretical approach
2.1 MNE:
why history matters?
2.2 Elements of business history
3 MNE in the Age of the Free Trade
3.1 Early-modern MNEs
3.2 The free standing company
4 The MNE in the Second Industrial
Revolution (1870-1914)
4.1 Big business and MNE (A.D. Chandler's model)
4.2 MNE and protectionism between the two World
Wars
5 MNE in a 'half-globalised' world
5.1 Rise and fall of the American model
5.2 MNE, cold war and
nationalism
6 The present challenges: MNE and
globalisation
Examinations
Students will be evaluated on:
·
Attendance and class
participation
·
A final multiple choice test
·
A 1500-2000 words paper
(preparation of a MNE case)
Reading list
·
Mira Wilkins, 'The
Free-Standing Company, 1870-1914: An Important Type of British Foreign Direct
Investment', The Economic History Review, Vol. 41, No. 2 (May, 1988),
pp. 259-282 [http://www.biblio.liuc.it:2115/stable/pdfplus/2596058.pdf]
·
Marcelo Bucheli, 'Multinational
corporations, totalitarian regimes and economic nationalism: United Fruit
Company in Central America, 1899-1975', Business
History, Vol. 50, No. 4 (July, 2008), pp. 433-454