The course intends to highlight the
relevance of the historical dimension for a deeper understanding of the
multinational enterprise evolution (MNE).
Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are one of
the driving forces of globalisation, but they are also, on many respects, a
controversial topic. Are MNEs an instrument of social and economic development
for both host and home countries? Are they, conversely, a tool of exploitation
of the less developed countries or are they driving work away from the
industrialised countries?
MNE is a long-standing phenomena and this
course argues that a historical perspective allows us to better understand
MNE's behaviour, stressing the importance of
'soft' dimensions (culture, information transfer, politics...).
The aim of the course is to allow students
to evaluate the impact of MNE in the history of home and host economies, retrieving information from some historical
sources, from media (documentaries and fictional movies) and comparing different points of views.
The course will deal with the topics of the
exploitation of natural resources, of labour issues and of knowledge transfer,
taking into account cases from XIXth to XXIth
Century.
Students' multicultural background and an
active class environment will enhance the effectiveness of the learning
experience that the course offers.
Syllabus
1
Introductory lesson
1.1
Course generalities
1.2
Theoretical approach
2
MNEs and work issues
2.1
Work in the Chinese Miracle
(XX-XXI Century)
2.2
Work in XIX Century's sweatshop
3
MNEs and natural resources
3.1
The case of multinational oil
industry (1930s and 1950s)
3.2
Are MNEs “imperialists”?
Politics and US FDI in South America during XX Century
4
MNEs cultural issues
4.1
Rise and fall of the managerial
American model (1950s-1970s)
4.2
Cultural clash in XIX Century
MNEs
Examinations
Students will be evaluated on:
·
Attendance and class
participation (group activities)
·
Marcelo Bucheli, 'Multinational
corporations, totalitarian regimes and economic nationalism: United Fruit
Company in Central America, 1899-1975', Business History, Vol. 50, No. 4
(July, 2008), pp. 433-454